|
| Recent Articles |
A New Way To Personalize Your Site
I've talked before about multivariate testing, an exciting technique for optimizing your Web conversion rates. Multivariate testing tools perform this alchemy...
The
Elephant in the SEO Living Room
Gord Hotchkiss put into words what I have been feeling: search marketers are paying far too little attention to personalized search. If you've looked at the babys...
SMX: The Fear Hits Personalized Search
People want better search results, but the personalization technology that can enable it may be a little scary to the privacy-conscious. WebProNews will have stories and...
Why B2B Personalization...
Amazon has the best (and best known) personalized Web experience, but B2B marketers face challenges that Amazon doesn't. After my post yesterday on the deepening of personalization across the...
Personalization And EDM
Over the last couple of days I have been pointed towards a couple of items that made me think some more about personalization and the fit of enterprise decision...
SEO Implications For Search...
A few days ago I wrote about my reservations with personalized search. I even called it dangerous. Most people won't have reservations, though. In fact it's unlikely the majority of people will ever realize...
The Personalization Of SEO And Search
Personalization of Search and its implications for SEO...The personalization of search alters search results from user to user based on the history and profile of the searcher.
|
|
08.02.07
Personalized Search - A Bump In The Road
 By Mike Moran
I've written before about personalized search-several times. I think it is the biggest change to come to search marketing since pay-per-click.
But what once promised to be a marketer's dream of knowing eternal behavioral histories of every searcher is being sharply curtailed. Each week another search engine announces some retrenchment due to privacy concerns. (Here's a good recap of recent personalized search privacy announcements.) What's going on?
Simply put, the search engines have not made a case to average searchers as to what's in it for them.
Personalization is a dance between the marketer and the customer. The customer has information to give and the marketer wants to get that information to use it to provide more targeted (and hence more lucrative) offers. The better the targeting, the higher the response.
But why should customers give up the information? They'll only do so if they see what they are getting. In a talk I gave last night, I got a question from the audience-Why would anyone register at a site? I turned the question around on her by asking whether she has ever registered at a site, and of course she had. Even someone who is dead set against giving up information sometimes sees value in providing that information.
What the search engines are doing is no different from what Amazon has always done. Customers happily register with Amazon to get the convenience of one-click and the personalized recommendations (even if they like to complain about them when they are wrong). Customers see value in this and have rarely questioned the privacy implications of Amazon looking at every move they make on the site.
Is it because the benefits are made explicit by Amazon? Customers see exactly what they get.
Personalized search has so far hidden the benefits. I wonder if the best way to proceed would be for search engines to explicitly note certin results that come from personalization. This is tricky, to be sure, because every part of the relevance ranking algorithm has an effect on results, but perhaps Google and company could make an effort to note those results that were largely driven by personalization and put some kind of icon on them.
Or maybe they could spur advertisers taking advantage of personalization to improve their offers and to note that they are personalized. So, if an advertiser is taking advantage of demographic knowledge or search history to present an offer, why not present an excellent offer? 10% off now! And show that the ad is a result of sharing personal information?
By taking these steps, the search engines would be making the value of personalization explicit to the searcher. If the searchers believe that they are getting real value for giving up their privacy, they may do so willingly.
Search engines are retrenching because searchers are complaining about privacy, but my opinion is that complaints about privacy are usually about lack of value-if searchers understood the value they might be happy to give up the privacy. Because the value is so vague, they are more concerned about what they are giving up.
I wonder if some smart search engine will try this. It would be interesting to see what happens if they do. Until then, expect to see more vague privacy fears until search engines wise up and give back some of the value they are getting from personalization.
Comments
|
